Difference between revisions of "Colloquium on 9 June 2018"
(→Structure of presentations) |
(minor adjustments) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
− | == Please put your project name, list of participants and URL to your presentation/data set here == | + | == Please put your project name, list of participants and URL to your presentation/data set here: == |
− | + | - [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Jlqv0J461demYNuDG6ZYF4lUSTjr8tWSCOYL5_BjT_Q/edit?usp=sharing Google Spreadsheet "4th Colloquium"] | |
== Structure of presentations == | == Structure of presentations == |
Revision as of 09:46, 2 June 2018
Please put your project name, list of participants and URL to your presentation/data set here:
- Google Spreadsheet "4th Colloquium"
Structure of presentations
Presentations will be 7 to 10 minutes long. We expect that you follow these steps in your presentations:
- short introduction of the research idea
- explanation of data sources – where is the data from, or how did you create it?
- explanation of the workflow – how did you process the data to answer your question?
- interpretation – what did you learn from processing/visualising the data set?
Alternative structure for Wikipedia task
If you decided to craft a Wikipedia article for the final colloquium, the structure is different:
- explain how you identified the article gap in Wikipedia
- explain how you gathered the material for the article
- explain how you created the article (chapters, references, in-links, experiences etc.)
For inspiration: Here are the Wikipedia articles written in our course last year.