Difference between revisions of "Colloquium on 9 June 2018"
(create page) |
(→Structure of presentations) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
# '''interpretation''' – what did you learn from processing/visualising the data set? | # '''interpretation''' – what did you learn from processing/visualising the data set? | ||
| + | == Alternative structure for Wikipedia task == | ||
If you decided to craft a Wikipedia article for the final colloquium, the structure is different: | If you decided to craft a Wikipedia article for the final colloquium, the structure is different: | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
# '''explain how you gathered the material for the article''' | # '''explain how you gathered the material for the article''' | ||
# '''explain how you created the article''' (chapters, references, in-links, experiences etc.) | # '''explain how you created the article''' (chapters, references, in-links, experiences etc.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | For inspiration: [[Article Assignments|Here are the Wikipedia articles written in our course last year.]] | ||
Revision as of 09:44, 2 June 2018
Please put your project name, list of participants and URL to your presentation/data set here
Structure of presentations
Presentations will be 7 to 10 minutes long. We expect that you follow these steps in your presentations:
- short introduction of the research idea
- explanation of data sources – where is the data from, or how did you create it?
- explanation of the workflow – how did you process the data to answer your question?
- interpretation – what did you learn from processing/visualising the data set?
Alternative structure for Wikipedia task
If you decided to craft a Wikipedia article for the final colloquium, the structure is different:
- explain how you identified the article gap in Wikipedia
- explain how you gathered the material for the article
- explain how you created the article (chapters, references, in-links, experiences etc.)
For inspiration: Here are the Wikipedia articles written in our course last year.
